设为首页 加入收藏

TOP

Oracle里count(1)、count(*)和count(主键)哪个更快(二)
2016-12-28 08:15:46 】 浏览:333
Tags:Oracle count 主键 哪个 更快
count(1) from journal_entries

Plan hash value: 42135099

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 2 | INDEX FULL SCAN| INDX_ECR_ID_JE | 1 | 9 | 9 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


14 rows selected.


可以看到两个语句的执行计划是完全相同的。


2、场景3也与前两个场景等价,因为id_je有NOT NULL约束


For Sel3, CBO does the same as for Sel1 and Sel2 since "id_je" has a NOT NULL constraint.


sys@ORCL>select count(id_je) from journal_entries;

COUNT(ID_JE)
------------
9

sys@ORCL>select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'runstats_last'));

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL_ID b1p4v15dwx7hs, child number 0
-------------------------------------
select count(id_je) from journal_entries

Plan hash value: 42135099

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 2 | INDEX FULL SCAN| INDX_ECR_ID_JE | 1 | 9 | 9 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


14 rows selected.


可以看到执行计划与前两个也是完全相同的。


4、场景4跟前边3个不同,因为balanced列上没有NOT NULL约束,但是balanced列上有索引,那会走这个列上的索引么?我们来看一下执行计划:


sys@ORCL>select count(balanced) from journal_entries;

COUNT(BALANCED)
---------------
9

sys@ORCL>select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'runstats_last'));

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL_ID bc3bc8c0fg14z, child number 0
-------------------------------------
select count(balanced) from journal_entries

Plan hash value: 3638043346

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 2 | INDEX FULL SCAN| INDX_ECR_DATE_JE_BALANCED | 1 | 9 | 9 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

14 rows selected.


我们看到这个执行计划没有走balanced列上的索

首页 上一页 1 2 3 下一页 尾页 2/3/3
】【打印繁体】【投稿】【收藏】 【推荐】【举报】【评论】 【关闭】 【返回顶部
上一篇Oracle物化视图增量刷新测试 下一篇Oracle的密码文件及远程SYSDBA登录

最新文章

热门文章

Hot 文章

Python

C 语言

C++基础

大数据基础

linux编程基础

C/C++面试题目